Biofuels: 'Irrational' and 'worse than nonrenewable fuel sources'
The UK's "irrational" use of biofuels will cost vehicle drivers around ₤ 460 million over the next 12 months, a think tank states.
A report by Chatham House, external says the growing dependence on sustainable liquid fuels will likewise increase food rates.
The author says that biodiesel made from vegetable oil was even worse for the climate than fossil fuels.
Under EU law, external, biofuels are set to comprise 5% of the UK's transport fuel from today.
Since 2008, the UK has required fuel suppliers to add a growing proportion of sustainable products into the fuel and diesel they supply. These biofuels are generally ethanol distilled from corn and biodiesel made from rapeseed, utilized cooking oil and tallow.
Deep fried fuel
But research performed for Chatham House says that reaching the 5% level indicates that UK motorists will have to pay an additional ₤ 460m a year since of the higher expense of fuel at the pump and from filling regularly as biofuels have a lower energy content.
The report state that if the UK is to satisfy its responsibilities to EU energy targets the cost to motorists is most likely to rise to ₤ 1.3 bn per year by 2020.
"It is tough to find any excellent news," Rob Bailey, senior research fellow at Chatham House, informed BBC News.
"Biofuels increase expenses and they are a very pricey way to lower carbon emissions," he said.
The EU biofuel requireds are likewise having extremely distorting impacts in the marketplace. Because used cooking oil is considered as among the most sustainable kinds of biodiesel, the rate for it has risen quickly. Rob Bailey says that towards completion of 2012 it was more costly than refined palm oil.
"It creates a financial incentive to buy refined palm oil, cook a chip in it to turn it into used cooking oil and then sell it at earnings,"
"It is crazy but the rewards exist."
There are also frets that taking EU land out of production to grow rapeseed oil in specific is creating more climate issues than it fixes. The more fuel of this type that is taken into automobiles the bigger the deficit developed in the edible oils market. This had actually resulted in increased imports of palm oil from Indonesia, typically produced on deforested land.
"Once you take into account these indirect results, biofuels made from vegetable oils in fact result worldwide in more emissions than you would get from using diesel in the first place," said Rob Bailey.
"Plus you are asking vehicle drivers to pay more for the fuel - it makes no sense, it is a totally unreasonable technique."
Biofuel benefits
The European Biodiesel Board (EBB), which represents the market, external throughout the EU, stated it knew the issues triggered by the required. But it believes that biofuels have numerous positives.
"Blaming biofuels for all the problems in the world is a bit too exaggerated," said Isabelle Maurizi, project supervisor at the EBB.
"It has brought great deals of advantages. It has actually enhanced the security of our diesel; it has decreased EU dependency on animal feed imports, thanks to the rapeseed we grow for biodiesel."
"If there was no biodiesel farmers would simply make their land idle - no food, no feed!"
As the UK strikes the 5% of liquid fuels mark, the federal government faces some challenging decisions on how to progress on this problem as it faces tripling the expenses for drivers by 2020.
Insiders suggest its choice would be to try and get agreement in Brussels on the effects of indirect costs which might constrain what counts as biofuel. However getting agreement from countries with powerful agricultural sectors who take advantage of the existing plan will be tough.
"When you have a lobby that includes the farming sector and the oil sector it is extremely difficult for Governments to make a U-turn," stated Rob Bailey.
County starts recycling chip fat
8 December 2010
How does Qantas fly on chip fat? Video, 00:02:00 How does Qantas fly on chip fat?
13 April 2012
Measuring energy crops' footprint
18 October 2012
